SUPREME COURT RULLING ON SHETTIMA’S DOUBLE NOMINATION:

The Apex Court today sitting in Abuja has ruled in favour of the Vice President Elect Shettima.

Justices have accused the PDP of using social media to set a trap for the Apex court to blackmail it.

The Justices further held that the conduct of the appellant (PDP), amounts to misleading the honourable court, describing the move as “pathetic”.

Record has it that Shettima withdrew his senate nomination on 6th July 2022 and was subsequently replaced.

At this point, he was no longer a candidate for the Red Chambers, and as such his position as vice president, did not constitute a multiple nomination breach.

On the case of Uche Nwosu which the PDP relied on, the Supreme Court Justices reminded the PDP, that they made the decision as at that time and are fully aware of the details.

Uche Nwosu in his case, got nominated by two political parties for different positions. They held that the the suit of the PDP, was bound to fail right from the trial court, to the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court.

The Justices further held that the action of the PDP was hurtful as it used the social media to set a trap for the Apex court to blackmail it, describing this situation as unfortunate, sad and uncalled for.

According to the judges, a political party has no right to challenge the action of another party, or the decision of INEC, in respect of another party.

They added that for a person to have locus standi to challenge the nomination process of a political party, the person must be a neutral person and an aspirant to that position, and a member of the party.

The justices held that no matter the pains of the PDP on how the APC conducted it’s primary elections and nominated its candidate, the PDP must remain as an onlooker.

They also reminded the PDP of the same issue in 1999 where Atiku Abubakar was nominated for the seat of Governor, but later moved on to become the Vice Presidential Candidate to Olusegun Obasanjo.

In that case, Atiku’s running mate – Boni Haruna took over the Governorship Nomination. INEC wanted to conduct a fresh election then, but the party kicked against it until it got to the Supreme Court.

The court asked the opposition party rhetorically what has changed since 1999.

The PDP had in its suit, claimed that Shettima’s nomination as Tinubu’s running mate, was in breach of the Provisions of sections 29(1), 33, 36 and 84 (1)(2) of the Electoral Act 2022, however, the court in its ruling stressed that the opposition party had no case.